logo
배너
사건의 세부 사항
> 사건 >

회사 사례 약 Background: Production Pain Points with Temperature-Sensitive Formulations

사건
문의하기
Mrs. Samson Sun
86--18665590218
지금 접촉하세요

Background: Production Pain Points with Temperature-Sensitive Formulations

2025-11-18

Background: Production Pain Points with Temperature-Sensitive Formulations
A production facility specializing in temperature-sensitive personal care products (including facial serums, night creams, and baby lotions) struggled with consistent quality and operational inefficiencies using non-heated emulsification equipment. For over three years, the facility relied on separate heating tanks and standard shear mixers to produce batches ranging from 200L to 600L. As demand for high-stability products grew—with daily output requirements rising from 10 tons to 18 tons—three critical issues emerged:
  • Unstable Emulsion Quality: Many formulations (e.g., night creams containing beeswax and shea butter) required precise heating to 65–70°C to fully melt solid oil-phase ingredients. With non-heated equipment, the facility used external water baths to preheat raw materials, leading to temperature fluctuations (±5°C) during transfer to the emulsification tank. This inconsistency caused 15–20% of batches to have uneven textures (e.g., grainy creams) or short shelf lives (separation within 2–3 months).
  • Extended Production Cycles: The two-step process (preheating in external tanks + emulsification) added 40–50 minutes per batch. A standard 400L batch of baby lotion took 120 minutes total—35 minutes for preheating, 20 minutes for transfer, and 65 minutes for emulsification—limiting the facility to 6 batches per day.
  • High Energy Waste: External water baths operated at 80°C (higher than needed to compensate for heat loss during transfer), consuming 18–20 kWh per batch. Additionally, reworking failed batches wasted 8–10% of raw materials monthly, increasing operational costs.
2. Selection and Integration of Heated Emulsifier
After testing three equipment types (non-heated emulsifiers, external-heat emulsifiers, and integrated heated emulsifiers), the facility chose an integrated heated emulsifier system. Key features included: a dual-layer jacketed tank (for uniform heating), digital temperature control (precision ±1°C), variable-speed shear heads (500–6,000 rpm), and a heat recovery function (to reduce energy loss). The decision focused on solving temperature inconsistency and streamlining production into a single step.
Integration took 6 days and involved three critical steps:
  • Tank Calibration: Engineers tested the jacketed heating system with water to verify temperature uniformity—ensuring no “hot spots” (common in external heating setups) across the tank. The system was calibrated to maintain 65°C for oil-phase melting and 40°C for adding 热敏 ive ingredients (e.g., preservatives).
  • Formula Adaptation: The team adjusted 8 core formulations to use the emulsifier’s integrated heating. For example, night cream production previously required preheating beeswax in a separate tank; now, solid ingredients were added directly to the emulsifier’s jacketed tank, with heating activated during mixing.
  • Staff Training: Operators received 3 days of training on temperature programming (e.g., setting ramp rates to avoid overheating), shear speed matching (e.g., lower speeds during initial heating to prevent splashing), and troubleshooting (e.g., addressing jacket heating delays).
3. Practical Application: Streamlining Production and Improving Quality
3.1 Batch Production of Night Cream (400L)
The heated emulsifier transformed the production workflow into a single, controlled process:
  1. Raw Material Loading: Solid oil-phase ingredients (beeswax, shea butter) and liquid oil-phase (jojoba oil, vitamin E) were added to the jacketed tank. Water-phase ingredients (deionized water, glycerin) were added to a separate compartment within the tank.
  1. Heating and Mixing: The jacketed system was set to heat the oil phase to 68°C (ramping at 2°C per minute) while the shear head operated at 1,500 rpm for gentle mixing. Real-time temperature data was displayed on the control panel, with alerts for deviations beyond ±1°C.
  1. Emulsification: Once the oil phase reached 68°C, the water phase (preheated to 65°C via the same jacket system) was slowly pumped into the oil phase. The shear speed was increased to 4,000 rpm for 25 minutes, ensuring full emulsification.
  1. Cooling and Finishing: After emulsification, the jacket system switched to cooling mode (using cold water circulation), lowering the batch temperature to 40°C. Preservatives and fragrance were added, and the shear speed was reduced to 800 rpm for 10 minutes to mix evenly.
  1. Total Batch Time: The process took 75 minutes—37.5% faster than the previous 120-minute cycle. No transfer steps meant no temperature loss, and the batch was ready for filling immediately.
3.2 Quality Improvements for Baby Lotion
Baby lotion (a highly temperature-sensitive product) previously had a 18% failure rate due to uneven melting of lanolin. With the heated emulsifier:
  • The jacketed tank maintained a steady 62°C during lanolin melting, eliminating graininess. Post-production testing showed emulsion particle size was consistent (10–15 μm) across all batches, compared to 20–30 μm with the old system.
  • Shelf-life stability increased from 3 months to 9 months, with no separation observed in accelerated aging tests (45°C for 30 days). Retail returns related to product quality dropped by 70%.
4. Long-Term Operational Benefits
Over 7 months of use, the heated emulsifier delivered measurable improvements:
  • Efficiency Gains: Daily batch count increased from 6 to 10, allowing the facility to meet the 18-ton daily output target without adding extra shifts.
  • Cost Savings: Energy consumption per batch fell by 35% (from 19 kWh to 12.35 kWh) due to integrated heating and heat recovery. Raw material waste dropped to 2% (from 9%) as batch failure rates decreased to 3%.
  • Sustainability: Reduced energy use cut monthly carbon emissions by 220 kg, and less waste meant fewer discarded raw material containers (saving 150kg of plastic monthly).
  • Reliability: The jacketed heating system operated with 99% uptime. Routine maintenance (e.g., cleaning jacket coils, calibrating temperature sensors) took less than 1 hour per week, with no unplanned downtime.
5. Key Insights from the Application
The heated emulsifier solved the facility’s core challenge—temperature inconsistency—by integrating heating directly into the emulsification process. Unlike traditional setups that rely on external heating (and risk heat loss/ fluctuations), its jacketed tank and precise temperature control ensured stable conditions for temperature-sensitive ingredients. For manufacturers producing creams, lotions, or serums that require melting solid components or avoiding thermal shock, this case demonstrates that heated emulsifiers can deliver both quality consistency and operational efficiency—critical for meeting consumer demands for reliable, long-lasting personal care products.